Wednesday, September 18, 2013

The Hunter and the Prey

            The PR hunter stalks its prey, carefully researching the prey’s deadlines, personal schedules, and preferred form of communication. The perfectly crafted news release quivers in the box, waiting anxiously to hit its mark. All the while the PR hunter waits for the perfect opening before–BAM! The pitch blows up in the hunters face. The pitch lacked the substance and the strength to hit is mark and the hunter falls back to re-group for the next shot.

            Suddenly, the prey picks up a bow of its own. The string pulled taunt, the arrow dipped in questions, and the aim precise. The hunter takes a direct hit, stumbles and then falls under the sheer power of the informational over-load packed into the shot. Unprepared for the turn of events the PR hunter dies, a slow painfully unemployed death.

             According to an article in the Journal of Public Relations Research titled: Media Catching and the Journalist-Public Relations Practitioner Relationship: How Social Media are Changing the Practice of Media Relations (wow, that’s a mouth-full), the traditional form of pitching has become old-school. No longer termed media pitching, now it’s media-catching.

While the authors agree the most vital component of the journalist-practitioners’ relationship is open, two-way communication, they see the individual’s roles shifting.  In fact Toddb Drefen, a principal at SHIFT Communications, created a social media press release “to allow for readers and observers to interact, contribute, and build on the content presented by organizations”. Drefen viewed the traditional news release as ‘‘the banal, unhelpful, cookie-cutter press releases of yore (that) have outlived their pre-Internet usefulness."

The article examined how the increase of social media has made the journalists’ job easier. No longer do they need to wait for the PR practitioner to draft a news release, telling the journalist what is important. Now the journalist can Google a topic, look on a website, and decide what information they want. Then journalist can decide if they want more information and if so will contact the PR practitioner directly. If the practitioner isn’t ready, the journalist may find other sources for their story.

What does that mean for us? The same core principles and skills apply, just the hand-off changed. Being prepared, the paramount skill required, allows for easier adaption and reaction. The article discusses the practitioners’ need to focus on all the social media outlets used by the client and make sure the information they want to share is clear, updated, and manageable.

The most important aspect of the article is understanding something Bob Dylan knew, The Times They are a-Changin. The PR practitioner once owned the message, spent time crafting it into a perfectly worded masterpiece, and deploying it only to those found worthy. Now the message needs to always be on stand-by, ready to be fired at will.

            And so, the hunter became the hunted. Does extinction lay in the future or will evolution create a stronger, faster, more nimble PR practitioner ready to handle the next phase of media Darwinism?

Works Cited

Waters, R., Tindall, N., Morton, T. "Media Catching and the Jounalist-Public Practitioners Relationship: How Social Media are Changing the Practices of Media Relations." Journal of Public Relations Research, 2010: 241-264.




3 comments:

  1. Angel,

    Hmmmm. After our conversation I was expecting something really bad - I am glad you have high-expectations for yourself. Besides carrying the metaphor on a bit longer than needed at the beginning, I thought this blog provided a unique perspective. The hunter is now the hunted, and what does that mean for us? I wonder if we now have even more pressure to provide good information in all forms of media. How can we turn up on Google, or in other media searches, if we are not actively pushing our organizations. Our jobs have definitely become more interactive, and I feel that makes us need to work harder rather than take the "if we build it they will come" point of view. How do you think we can be prepared or guide the media to us for information?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The article I referenced highlighted the client’s website as the key to keeping the journalist informed on the lasted information. Specifically the employee profiles, company news and feature articles. The employee profiles allow the journalist to find who they want to talk to without having to make phone calls. If anything news worth happens it should first appear on the company website and can then be disseminated to the public. This will provide a cohesive message to the employees and the outside publics. Feature articles provide the fluff and easy filler articles the media may need on a slow news day. If they know your client’s website is filled with useful, current, and relevant information they will be more likely to use that information and thus share your message. With all the websites available, for journalists to choose from, your client’s needs to be the best choice in all categories

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Such a well-written blog, Angel! I love the way you started the blog - it pulled me in and your blog kept me going...then you finished with the same story line you began with "the hunter." Loved it!

      As for your question - I am sure PR professionals will roll with the punches and change with the times. And, a lot of company’s still use press releases to this day, they haven't been phased out yet. Also, I think one should have a press release ready so when the reporter does call, you have the information at your fingertips - ready to give out!

      And for Christine's comment - I don't necessarily think we have to work harder - but we will definitely have to work smarter!

      Delete